4.1 Article

Distinct nuclear gene expression profiles in cells with mtDNA depletion and homoplasmic A3243G mutation

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.02.002

关键词

mitochondria; mtDNA; expression; diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pathobiochemical pathways determining the wide variability in phenotypic expression of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations are not well understood. Most pathogenic mtDNA mutations induce a general defect in mitochondrial respiration and thereby ATP synthesis. Yet phenotypic expression of the different mtDNA mutations shows large variations that are difficult to reconcile with ATP depletion as sole pathogenic factor, implying that additional mechanisms contribute to the phenotype. Here, we use DNA microarrays to identify changes in nuclear gene expression resulting from the presence of the A3243G diabetogenic mutation and from a depletion of mtDNA (rho(o) cells). We find that cells respond mildly to these mitochondrial states with both general and specific changes in nuclear gene expression. This observation indicates that cells can sense the status of mtDNA. A number of genes show divergence in expression in rho(o) cells compared to cells with the A3243G mutation, such as genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation. As a common response in A3243G and rho(o) cells, mRNA levels for extracellular matrix genes are up-regulated, while the mRNA levels of genes involved in ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation and in ribosomal protein synthesis is down-regulated. This reduced expression is reflected at the level of cytosolic protein synthesis in both A3243G and rho(o) cells. Our finding that mitochondrial dysfunction caused by different mutations affects nuclear gene expression in partially distinct ways suggests that multiple pathways link mitochondrial function to nuclear gene expression and contribute to the development of the different phenotypes in mitochondrial disease. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据