4.5 Article

AD with subcortical white matter lesions and vascular dementia: CSF markers for differential diagnosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 237, 期 1-2, 页码 83-88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.05.016

关键词

dementia; biomarkers; diagnosis; cerebro-vascular disorder; white matter changes

资金

  1. Telethon [GGP030368] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated whether the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers beta-amyloid 1-42 (A beta 1-42), total tau (t-tau) protein and tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) could discriminate Alzheimer's disease (AD) from vascular dementia (VD) patients. CSF samples of A 1-42, t-tau, and p-tau181 were collected from probable AD (n=35), probable AD with white matter changes (WNC) indicative of concomitant cerebrovascular disorder (CVD, n=31), VD (n=20), and an age-matched subgroup of patients with other neurological disorders (OND) without cognitive impairment (n=24). AD patients showed very low A beta 1-42 levels (median=393 pg/ml). A beta 1-42, but not t-tau, differentiated AD from VD patients. However, the markers did not discriminate AD vs. AD plus WMC. In particular, both subgroups showed similar CSF biomarkers but they were significantly different from VD. ROC analysis showed that A beta 1-42 could discriminate AD from VD (AUC = 0.85). The cutoff of 493 pg/ml gave sensitivity and specificity values of 77% and 80%, respectively. Similar results were obtained when A beta 1-42 was employed to discriminate AD with WMC from VD (95% specificity and 60% sensitivity, but with cutoff of 750 pg/ml). T-tau increased aspecifically in all cognitively impaired patients. P-tau 181 performed better than t-tau in discriminating AD (with or without WMC) vs. VD. In conclusion, A beta 1-42 proved to be a valuable tool to discriminate AD vs. VD patients and possibly to improve diagnostic accuracy in clinical forms, improperly classified as mixed dementia based on radiological vascular lesions. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据