4.7 Review

Risk of death with atypical antipsychotic drug treatment for dementia - Meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 294, 期 15, 页码 1934-1943

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.15.1934

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Atypical antipsychotic medications are widely used to treat delusions, aggression, and agitation in people with Alzheimer disease and other dementia; however, concerns have arisen about the increased risk for cerebrovascular adverse events, rapid cognitive decline, and mortality with their use. Objective To assess the evidence for increased mortality from atypical antipsychotic drug treatment for people with dementia. Data Sources MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2005, Issue 1), meetings presentations (1997-2004), and information from the sponsors were searched using the terms for atypical antipsychotic drugs (aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone), dementia, Alzheimer disease, and clinical trial. Study Selection Published and unpublished randomized placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trials of atypical antipsychotic drugs marketed in the United States to treat patients with Alzheimer disease or dementia were selected by consensus of the authors. Data Extraction Trials, baseline characteristics, outcomes, all-cause dropouts, and deaths were extracted by one reviewer; treatment exposure was obtained or estimated. Data were checked by a second reviewer. Data Synthesis Fifteen trials (9 unpublished), generally 10 to 12 weeks in duration, including 16 contrasts of atypical antipsychotic drugs with placebo met criteria (aripiprazole [n=3], olanzapine [n=5], quetiapine [n=3], rispericlone [n=5]). A total of 3353 patients were randomized to study drug and 1757 were randomized to placebo. Outcomes were assessed using standard methods (with random- or fixed-effects model,) to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and risk differences based on patients randomized and relative risks based on total exposure to treatment. There were no differences in dropouts. Death occurred more often among patients randomized to drugs (118 [3.5 %] vs 40 [2.3 %]. The OR by meta-analysis was 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.23; P=.02; and risk difference was 0.01; 95% Cl, 0.004-0.02; P=.01). Sensitivity analyses did not show evidence for differential risks for individual drugs, severity, sample selection, or diagnosis. Conclusions Atypical antipsychotic drugs may be associated with a small increased risk for death compared with placebo. This risk should be considered within the context of medical need for the drugs, efficacy evidence, medical comorbidity, and the efficacy and safety of alternatives. Individual patient analyses modeling survival and causes of death are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据