4.7 Article

Extracellular heat shock protein 70: A critical component for motoneuron survival

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 42, 页码 9735-9745

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1912-05.2005

关键词

muscle extract; cell death; apoptosis; stress response; Hsp70; motoneuron; trophic

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS046615, NS03061, NS046615] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dependence of developing spinal motoneuron survival on a soluble factor(s) from their target, muscle tissue is well established both in vivo and in vitro. Considering this apparent dependence, we examined whether a specific component of the stress response mediates motoneuron survival in trophic factor-deprived environments. We demonstrate that, although endogenous expression of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) did not change during trophic factor deprivation, application of e-rhHsp70 (exogenous recombinant human Hsp70) promoted motoneuron survival. Conversely, depletion of HSP70 from chick muscle extract (MEx) potently reduces the survival-promoting activity of MEx. Additionally, exogenous treatment with or spinal cord overexpression of Hsp70 enhances motoneuron survival in vivo during the period of naturally occurring cell death [programmed cell death (PCD)]. Hindlimb muscle cells and lumbar spinal astrocytes readily secrete HSP70 in vitro, suggesting potential physiological sources of extracellular Hsp70 for motoneurons. However, in contrast to exogenous treatment with or overexpression of Hsp70 in vivo, muscle-targeted injections of this factor in an ex vivo preparation fail to attenuate motoneuron PCD. These data (1) suggest that motoneuron survival requirements may extend beyond classical trophic factors to include HSP70, (2) indicate that the source of this factor is instrumental in determining its trophic function, and (3) may therefore influence therapeutic strategies designed to increase motoneuron Hsp70 signaling during disease or injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据