4.7 Article

Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 42, 页码 9669-9679

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2414-05.2005

关键词

cone mosaic; adaptive optics; retina; color vision; trichromacy; retinal densitometry

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY01931, EY14749, R01 EY009303, F32 EY014749, R01 EY009620, EY01319, P30 EY001931, P30 EY001319, EY04367, R01 EY004367, EY09620, EY09303] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using high-resolution adaptive-optics imaging combined with retinal densitometry, we characterized the arrangement of short- (S), middle- (M), and long- (L) wavelength-sensitive cones in eight human foveal mosaics. As suggested by previous studies, we found males with normal color vision that varied in the ratio of L to M cones (from 1.1: 1 to 16.5:1). We also found a protan carrier with an even more extreme L: M ratio (0.37:1). All subjects had nearly identical S-cone densities, indicating independence of the developmental mechanism that governs the relative numerosity of L/M and S cones. L: M cone ratio estimates were correlated highly with those obtained in the same eyes using the flicker photometric electroretinogram (ERG), although the comparison indicates that the signal from each M cone makes a larger contribution to the ERG than each L cone. Although all subjects had highly disordered arrangements of L and M cones, three subjects showed evidence for departures from a strictly random rule for assigning the L and M cone photopigments. In two retinas, these departures corresponded to local clumping of cones of like type. In a third retina, the L: M cone ratio differed significantly at two retinal locations on opposite sides of the fovea. These results suggest that the assignment of L and M pigment, although highly irregular, is not a completely random process. Surprisingly, in the protan carrier, in which X-chromosome inactivation would favor L- or M-cone clumping, there was no evidence of clumping, perhaps as a result of cone migration during foveal development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据