4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

MFI/MEL intergrowth and its effect on n-decane cracking

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 107-08, 期 -, 页码 809-815

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.013

关键词

cracking; n-decane; MFI zeolite; MEL zeolite; intergrowth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of intergrowths of zeolite MFI and MEL structures were synthesized with various Si/Al ratios from as low as 8 up to 17 and various degree of intergrowth. The solids were synthesized from gels containing mixtures of tetrapropylammonium bromine and tetrabutylammonium bromine as structure directing agents (T1 and T2), at a chemical molar composition of 100SiO(2):xAl(2)O(3):10Na(2)O:30T:4200H(2)O. The solids were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), adsorption/desorption of N-2 at 77 K, electron diffraction diffuse scattering, chemical analysis by energy-dispersive X-rays and acidity assessment by step-wise temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of NH3. The percentage of intergrowth was determined by comparison of the experimental diffraction pattern with simulated patterns using DIFFaX software. Well-crystallized samples were obtained from gels with nominal Si/Al ratios of 11 and 25; for Si/Al = 10, the samples were less crystalline. The Si/Al ratios obtained were in most cases lower than that of the starting gel and the intergrowth percentages obtained were lower than expected based on the relative amounts of structure directing agents in the gel; the highest degree of intergrowth achieved was 85% MFI/15% MEL. The effects of intergrowth structures on the activity and selectivity of the n-decane cracking reaction was studied at 400 degrees C and atmospheric pressure. The catalyst activity was a linear function of the concentration of strong acid sites. The selectivity showed that although the pentasil zeolite pore structure limits isomerization and hydrogen transfer reactions, MFI has a more open structure than MEL and intergrowth shows intermediate behavior between these two structures. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据