4.4 Article

Bone biomechanical property deterioration due to tobacco smoke exposure

期刊

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
卷 77, 期 5, 页码 319-326

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-005-0072-1

关键词

tobacco; smoking; cigarette; bone mineral content; bone mineral density; bone strength; mouse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tobacco smoking has been implicated in the development of osteoporosis and early onset of menopause in women smokers. We measured various biomechanical properties of femurs and tibiae obtained from smoke-exposed and control mice to determine cigarette smoke influences on bone mass, structure, and strength. Growing female C57BL mice were exposed to sidestream cigarette smoke in a whole-body exposure chamber, set at 30 +/- 2 mg smoke particulates/m(3) for 4 hours/day and 5 days/week for 12 consecutive weeks. Elevated levels of urinary cotinine and pulmonary ethoxyresorufin deethylase activity in smoke-exposed mice confirmed their effective exposure to cigarette smoke. There were no differences in body weight and physical size (length, medial-lateral and anterior-posterior widths, midshaft cortical area and thickness) of femurs and tibiae between smoke-exposed and control mice. The femoral mid-shaft yield load, stiffness, yield stress, and modulus were, respectively 8%, 13%, 10%, and 14% lower (P < 0.05) in smoke-exposed compared to control mice. The ultimate load and stress in mid-shaft femurs showed decreasing trends (P < 0.1) in smoke-exposed mice. In the femoral neck, the ultimate load and stiffness were 9% and 12% lower (P < 0.05) in smoke-exposed mice, respectively. Further, the ash-to-dry bone weight ratio was smaller (similar to 6%, P < 0.05), and micro-computed tomographic scanning of distal femoral bone volume/total volume (%) and trabecular thickness showed decreasing trends in smoke-exposed mice compared to the control group. We conclude that exposure to tobacco smoke deteriorates some of the biomechanical properties of bone in growing female mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据