4.7 Article

Role of sulphate transporter systems in sulphur efficiency of mustard genotypes

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 169, 期 5, 页码 842-846

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.05.036

关键词

Brassica juncea; sulphur efficiency; S uptake; sulphate transporter systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fourteen genotypes of mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss.] were grown for 30 days in complete nutrient solution with 50 mu M (S-insufficient) and 1 mM (S-sufficient) sulphur levels, and sulphur efficiency (SE) was analysed. SE, the ability of a plant to maintain good growth on S-limited condition, was calculated as the ratio of dry matter production at low and high S supply. There was 2-10-fold differences in SE of the genotypes. Of the 14 genotypes, Pusa Bold was identified as the most S-efficient, while Pusa Jai Kisan the most S-inefficient. SE of Pusa Bold was about 10-fold higher than Pusa Jai Kisan. To find out the physiological basis of this difference, we investigated the possible role of SO42- influx across the root cell plasma membrane in conferring SE by measuring the short-term (SO42-)-S-35 uptake in two contrasting genotypes, S-efficient Pusa Bold and S-inefficient Pusa Jai Kisan. This was done by quantifying sulphate uptake over two different concentration ranges: a high-concentration range (50-500 mu M) and a low-concentration range (5-50 mu M). Uptake experiments revealed the presence of two separate sulphate transporter systems mediating high- and low-affinity sulphate uptake. Interestingly, the sulphate uptake by the roots of Pusa Bold is mediated by both high- and low-affinity sulphate transporter systems, while that of Pusa Jai Kisan by only low-affinity sulphate transporter system. The study suggests that root SO42- uptake rate may play an important role in conferring S efficiency of mustard genotypes under S-limiting condition. This information may be useful in breeding mustard varieties more efficient in acquiring S from soil solution. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据