4.7 Article

Immunotherapy Markedly Increases the Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Therapy for Treatment of Burkholderia pseudomallei Infection

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 1785-1792

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01513-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID, NIH [U54 AI065357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Burkholderia pseudomallei is a soil bacterium that is endemic in southeast Asia and northern Australia and that can cause both acutely lethal pneumonia and chronic systemic infections in humans. The effective treatment of infection with B. pseudomallei requires rapid diagnosis and prolonged treatment with high doses of antimicrobials, and even with appropriate antibiotic therapy, patient relapses are common. Thus, new approaches to the treatment of B. pseudomallei infections are needed. In the present study, we asked whether active immunotherapy with gamma interferon (IFN-gamma), a key cytokine regulating the intracellular replication of B. pseudomallei, could increase the effectiveness of conventional antimicrobial therapy for B. pseudomallei infection. Macrophage infection assays and in vivo pulmonary challenge models were used to assess the inhibitory effects of combined treatment with IFN-gamma and ceftazidime on B. pseudomallei infection. We found that treatment with even very low doses of IFN-gamma and ceftazidime elicited strong synergistic inhibition of B. pseudomallei growth within infected macrophages. In vivo, active immunotherapy markedly potentiated the effectiveness of low-dose ceftazidime therapy for the treatment of infected mice in a pulmonary challenge model of B. pseudomallei. Combined treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the bacterial burden and a significant lessening of bacterial dissemination. We concluded, therefore, that immunotherapy with either endogenous or exogenous IFN-gamma could significantly increase the effectiveness of conventional antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of acute B. pseudomallei infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据