4.7 Article

Robust nonrigid registration to capture brain shift from intraoperative MRI

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 1417-1427

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2005.856734

关键词

brain shift; finite element model; intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging; nonrigid registration

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA067165] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR013218] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R21 MH067054, R21 MH67054] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NLM NIH HHS [R01 LM007861] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a new algorithm to register 3-D preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images to intraoperative MR images of the brain which have undergone brain shift. This algorithm relies on a robust estimation of the deformation from a sparse noisy set of measured displacements. We propose a new framework to compute the displacement field in an iterative process, allowing the solution to gradually move from an approximation formulation (minimizing the sum of a regularization term and a data error term) to an interpolation formulation (least square minimization of the data error term). An outlier rejection step is introduced in this gradual registration process using a weighted least trimmed squares approach, aiming at improving the robustness of the algorithm. We use a patient-specific model discretized with the finite element method in order to ensure a realistic mechanical behavior of the brain tissue. To meet the clinical time constraint, we parallelized the slowest step of the algorithm so that we can perform a full 3-D image registration in 35 s (including the image update time) on a heterogeneous cluster of 15 personal computers. The algorithm has been tested on six cases of brain tumor resection, presenting a brain shift of up to 14 mm. The results show a good ability to recover large displacements, and a limited decrease of accuracy near the tumor resection cavity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据