4.5 Article

Cryoprotection by urea in a terrestrially hibernating frog

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 208, 期 21, 页码 4079-4089

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01859

关键词

amphibian; freeze tolerance; osmolyte; hibernation; Rana sylvatica; wood frog; cryoprotection

类别

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [1R15DK48067-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of urea as a balancing osmolyte in osmotic adaptation is well known, but this 'waste product' also has myriad other functions in diverse taxa. We report that urea plays an important, previously undocumented role in freezing tolerance of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica), a northern woodland species that hibernates terrestrially in sites where dehydration and freezing may occur. Wood frogs inhabiting an outdoor enclosure accumulated urea to 65 mmol l(-1) in autumn and early winter, when soil moisture was scarce, but subsequently urea levels fell to similar to 2 mmol l(-1) as the availability of environmental water increased. Laboratory experiments showed that hibernating R. sylvatica can accumulate at least 90 mmol l(-1) urea under relatively dry, warm conditions. During experimental freezing, frogs synthesized glucose but did not accumulate additional urea. Nevertheless, the concentrations of urea and glucose in some tissues were similar. We tested urea's efficacy as a cryoprotectant by measuring lysis and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage in samples of R. sylvatica erythrocytes frozen/thawed in the presence of physiological levels of urea or other osmolytes. In conferring protection against freeze/thaw damage, urea was comparable to glycerol and as good as or better than glucose, cryoprotectants found in freeze-tolerant frogs and other animals. Urea treatment also improved the viability of intact tissues frozen in vitro, as demonstrated by post-thaw measures of metabolic activity and LDH leakage. Collectively, our findings suggest that urea functions both as an osmoprotectant and a cryoprotectant in terrestrially hibernating amphibians.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据