4.6 Article

Monitoring retinal function in early age-related maculopathy: visual performance after 1 year

期刊

EYE
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 1169-1177

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701711

关键词

multifocal electroretinogram; early age-related maculopathy; cone-mediated function; rod-mediated function; mfERG; monitoring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To monitor visual performance in early age-related maculopathy (ARM). Methods We measured monocular visual function - high-contrast visual acuity (HC-VA), central visual fields (mean sensitivity, MS), colour vision (desaturated Panel D-15), Pelli-Robson (P-R), and cone- and rod-mediated multifocal electroretinograms (mfERG) in 13 ARM subjects and 13 age-matched control subjects with normal fundi at baseline and after 1 year. All had visual acuity of 6/12 or better. The mfERG data were compared to templates derived from the control group at baseline. We analysed the mfERG results by averaging the central and peripheral fields and the superior and inferior fields (CP and SI methods) and by calculating the local responses. Results The mean rod-mediated responses were significantly delayed in the ARM group for the CP (P = 0.04) and the SI methods (P = 0.03) at baseline compared to the control group. This did not change significantly after 1 year, whereas the mean cone- mediated responses were within the normal range at both times. Although the local analysis revealed lower amplitudes for the cone- and rod-mediated responses at baseline this was not found after 1 year and only the local rod-mediated latencies were delayed at both times (P < 0.01). HC-VA, desaturated Panel D-15 and P-R were significantly worse in the ARM group (P <= 0.01) at baseline but did not show further significant deterioration. Progressive fundus changes were found in only two subjects (18%). Conclusion Although there was significant impairment of retinal function in early ARM at baseline no further deterioration was evident after 1 year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据