4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Quantifying the effect of posture on intracranial physiology in humans by MRI flow studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 591-596

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20427

关键词

cine phase contrast; upright postured CSF flow; CBF; cerebral venous outflow; intracranial compliance and pressure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To quantify the effect of posture on intracranial physiology in humans by MRI, and demonstrate the relationship between intracranial compliance (ICC) and pressure (ICP). and the pulsatility of blood and CSF flows. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy volunteers (29 +/- 7 years old) were scanned in the supine and sitting positions using a vertical gap MRI scanner. Pulsatile blood and CSF flows into and out from the brain were visualized and quantified using time-of-flight (TOF) and clue phase-contrast techniques. respectively. The total cerebral blood flow (tCBF), venous outflow. ICC, and ICP for the two postures were then calculated from the arterial. venous, and CSF volumetric flow rate waveforms using a previously described method. Results: In the upright posture, venous outflow is considerably less pulsatile (57%) and occurs predominantly through the vertebral plexus, while in the supine posture venous outflow occurs predominantly through the internal jugular veins. A slightly lower tCBF (12%), a considerably smaller CSF volume oscillating between the cranium and the spinal canal (48%). and a much larger ICC (2.8-fold) with a corresponding decrease in the MRI-derived ICP values were measured in the sitting position. Conclusion: The effect of posture on intracranial physiology can be quantified by MRI because posture-related changes in ICC and ICP strongly affect the dynamics of cerebral blood and CSF flows. This study provides important insight into the coupling that exists between arterial, venous, and CSF flow dynamics. and how it is affected by posture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据