4.7 Article

Newly Identified Antibacterial Compounds Are Topoisomerase Poisons in African Trypanosomes

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 620-626

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01025-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01AI028855, T32GM07309]
  2. PhRMA Foundation's Paul Calabresi Medical Student Research Fellowship
  3. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human African trypanosomiasis, caused by the Trypanosoma brucei protozoan parasite, is fatal when left untreated. Current therapies are antiquated, and there is a need for new pharmacologic agents against T. brucei targets that have no human ortholog. Trypanosomes have a single mitochondrion with a unique mitochondrial DNA, known as kinetoplast DNA (kDNA), a topologically complex network that contains thousands of interlocking circular DNAs, termed minicircles (similar to 1 kb) and maxicircles (similar to 23 kb). Replication of kDNA depends on topoisomerases, enzymes that catalyze reactions that change DNA topology. T. brucei has an unusual type IA topoisomerase that is dedicated to kDNA metabolism. This enzyme has no ortholog in humans, and RNA interference (RNAi) studies have shown that it is essential for parasite survival, making it an ideal drug target. In a large chemical library screen, two compounds were recently identified as poisons of bacterial topoisomerase IA. We found that these compounds are trypanocidal in the low micromolar range and that they promote the formation of linearized minicircles covalently bound to protein on the 5' end, consistent with the poisoning of mitochondrial topoisomerase IA. Surprisingly, however, band depletion studies showed that it is topoisomerase IImt, and not topoisomerase IA(mt), that is trapped. Both compounds are planar aromatic polycyclic structures that intercalate into and unwind DNA. These findings reinforce the utility of topoisomerase IImt as a target for development of new drugs for African sleeping sickness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据