4.7 Article

Inhibition of Intracellular Growth of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium in Tissue Culture by Antisense Peptide-Phosphorodiamidate Morpholino Oligomer

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 53, 期 9, 页码 3700-3704

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00099-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two types of phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMOs) were tested for inhibition of growth of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Both PMOs have the same 11-base sequence that is antisense to the region near the start codon of acpP, which is essential for lipid biosynthesis and viability. To the 3' end of each is attached the membrane-penetrating peptide (RXR)(4)XB (R, X, and B indicate arginine, 6-aminohexanoic acid, and beta-alanine, respectively). One peptide-PMO (AcpP PPMO) has no charge on the PMO moiety. The second PPMO has three cations (piperazine) attached to the phosphorodiamidate linkages (3 + Pip-AcpP PPMO). A scrambled-sequence PPMO (Scr PPMO) was synthesized for each type of PMO. The MICs of AcpP PPMO, 3 + Pip-AcpP PPMO, and either one of the Scr PPMOs were 1.25 mu M (7 mu g/ml), 0.156 mu M(0.94 mu g/ml), and > 160 mu M (> 900 mu g/ml), respectively. 3 + Pip-AcpP PPMO at 1.25 or 2.5 mu M significantly reduced the growth rates of pure cultures, whereas AcpP PPMO or either Scr PPMO had no effect. However, the viable cell count was significantly reduced at either concentration of 3 + Pip-AcpP PPMO or AcpP PPMO, but not with either Scr PPMO. In other experiments, macrophages were infected intracellularly with S. enterica and treated with 3 mu M 3 + Pip-AcpP PPMO. Intracellular bacteria were reduced > 99% with 3 + Pip-AcpP PPMO, whereas intracellular bacteria increased 3 orders of magnitude in untreated or Scr PPMO-treated cultures. We conclude that either AcpP PPMO or 3 + Pip-AcpP PPMO inhibited growth of S. enterica in pure culture and that 3 + Pip-AcpP PPMO reduced intracellular viability of S. enterica in macrophages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据