4.6 Article

Attenuation of apoptosis in enterocytes by blockade of potassium channels

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00001.2005

关键词

IEC-6 cells; apoptotic K+ efflux; p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; intestinal pathologies

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-55312] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-O48089] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [A1-494-73-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apoptosis plays an important role in maintaining the balance between proliferation and cell loss in the intestinal epithelium. Apoptosis rates may increase in intestinal pathologies such as inflammatory bowel disease and necrotizing enterocolitis, suggesting pharmacological prevention of apoptosis as a therapy for these conditions. Here, we explore the feasibility of this approach using the rat epithelial cell line IEC-6 as a model. On the basis of the known role of K+ efflux in apoptosis in various cell types, we hypothesized that K+ efflux is essential for apoptosis in enterocytes and that pharmacological blockade of this efflux would inhibit apoptosis. By probing intracellular [K+] with the K+-sensitive fluorescent dye and measuring the efflux of Rb-86(+), we found that apoptosis-inducing treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 leads to a twofold increase in K+ efflux from IEC-6 cells. Blockade of K+ efflux with tetraethylammonium, 4-aminopyridine, stromatoxin, chromanol 293B, and the recently described K+ channel inhibitor 48F10 prevents DNA fragmentation, caspase activation, release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. Thus K+ efflux occurs early in the apoptotic program and is required for the execution of later events. Apoptotic K+ efflux critically depends on activation of p38 MAPK. These results demonstrate for the first time the requirement of K+ channel-mediated K+ efflux for progression of apoptosis in enterocytes and suggest the use of K+ channel blockers to prevent apoptotic cell loss occurring in intestinal pathologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据