4.7 Article

Probucol enhances the expression of human hepatic scavenger receptor class B type I, possibly through a species-specific mechanism

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000185834.98941.3d

关键词

atherosclerosis; high-density lipoprotein; probucol; reverse cholesterol transport; scavenger receptor class B type I

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) is a major receptor for high-density lipoproteins (HDL) in the liver, which is the terminus of reverse cholesterol transport. Overexpression of SR-BI attenuated experimental atherosclerosis in murine models, concomitant with a reduction in plasma HDL-cholesterol levels. Probucol is known to be a potent hypolipidemic drug to regress xanthoma formation and carotid atherosclerosis in conjunction with a marked reduction in HDL-cholesterol levels. The aim of the present study was to know the effect of probucol on the expression of SR-BI and the underlying mechanism. Methods and Results-We found that probucol increased the expression of SR-BI proteins in in vitro human liver cells and an in vivo rabbit model, but not in wild-type C57B16 mice. The decay curve of SR-BI protein was markedly retarded in probucol-treated HepG2 cells in the presence of cycloheximide, indicating that probucol may stabilize human SR-BI protein. To determine the underlying mechanism for the observed species-specific effect, we conducted the following host-swap experiments, in which SR-BI was transfected or expressed in heterologous cells or hosts. Probucol did not increase human SR-BI protein in the liver of transgenic mice carrying the entire human SR-BI genome. Although probucol could stabilize even murine SR-BI, when transfected into a human cell line, HepG2, human SR-BI was not stabilized in a mouse hepatoma cell line, Hepa 1-6, treated with probucol. Conclusion-Probucol enhances hepatic SR-BI protein expression, possibly through species-specific stabilization of the protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据