4.3 Article

The impact of varying volumes in rectal balloons on rectal dose sparing in conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer -: A prospective three-dimension analysis

期刊

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
卷 181, 期 11, 页码 709-716

出版社

URBAN & VOGEL
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-005-1443-2

关键词

radiotherapy; rectal balloon; prostate cancer; clinical target volume

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose: The use of a rectal balloon Leads to a protection of the posterior rectal wall in irradiation of prostate cancer. The purpose of this analysis was to quantitatively assess the optimal volume in rectal balloons concerning rectal dose sparing in different clinical target volumes (CTVs) in prostate cancer irradiation. Patients and Methods: 14 patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing external beam radiotherapy were investigated. The prostate, the entire and the proximal seminal vesicles were delineated as CTV. Treatment plans without a rectal balloon and with a rectal balloon inflated with 40 ml (six patients) or 60 ml air (eight patients) were generated for each CTV and compared concerning rectal dose volume histograms. Results: The use of a rectal balloon filled with 40 ml air Led to no significant advantage in radiation exposure of the rectal wall in all CTVs. The use of a rectal balloon filled with 60 ml air resulted in a significant decrease of the exposed rectal wall volume in all CTVs with a reduced estimated risk for chronic toxicity in case of inclusion of the proximal or entire seminal vesicles into the CTV. Conclusion: The use of a rectal balloon filled with 60 ml air Led to a significantly decreased proportion of the irradiated rectal wall for all CTVs. This volume filled in rectal balloons is therefore recommended for use. In case of irradiation of the prostate without the seminal vesicles, the use of a rectal balloon should be considered carefully concerning the patients' imaginable discomfort using a rectal balloon and a questionable advantage concerning the estimated risk for chronic toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据