4.7 Article

Identification and biochemical characterization of small-molecule inhibitors of West Nile virus serine protease by a high-throughput screen

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 52, 期 9, 页码 3385-3393

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01508-07

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AI57705, AI070791]
  2. MARCE [AI-02-031]
  3. NIH
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

West Nile virus and dengue virus are mosquito-borne flaviviruses that cause a large number of human infections each year. No vaccines or chemotherapeutics are currently available. These viruses encode a serine protease that is essential for polyprotein processing, a required step in the viral replication cycle. In this study, a high-throughput screening assay for the West Nile virus protease was employed to screen similar to 32,000 small-molecule compounds for identification of inhibitors. Lead inhibitor compounds with three distinct core chemical structures (1 to 3) were identified. In a secondary screening of selected compounds, two compounds, belonging to the 8-hydroxyquinoline family (compounds A and B) and containing core structure 1, were identified as potent inhibitors of the West Nile virus protease, with K-i values of 3.2 +/- 0.3 mu M and 3.4 +/- 0.6 mu M, respectively. These compounds inhibited the dengue virus type 2 protease with Ki values of 28.6 +/- 5.1 mu M and 30.2 +/- 8.6 mu M, respectively, showing some selectivity in the inhibition of these viral proteases. However, the compounds show no inhibition of cellular serine proteases, trypsin, or factor Xa. Kinetic analysis and molecular docking of compound B onto the known crystal structure of the West Nile virus protease indicate that the inhibitor binds in the substrate-binding cleft. Furthermore, compound B was capable of inhibiting West Nile virus RNA replication in cultured Vero cells (50% effective concentration, 1.4 +/- 0.4 mu M; selectivity index, 100), presumably by inhibition of polyprotein processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据