4.7 Article

Differential dimethyl labeling of N-termini of peptides after guanidination for proteome analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 2099-2108

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr050215d

关键词

dimethylation; guanidination; 2MEGA; isotope labeling; quantitative proteomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe an enabling technique for proteome analysis based on isotope-differential dimethyl labeling of N-termini of tryptic peptides followed by microbore liquid chromatography (LC) matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry (MS). In this method, lysine side chains are blocked by guanidination to prevent the incorporation of multiple labels, followed by N-terminal labeling via reductive amination using d(0),C-12-formaldehyde or d(2),C-13-formaldehyde. Relative quantification of peptide mixtures is achieved by examining the MALDI mass spectra of the peptide pairs labeled with different isotope tags. A nominal mass difference of 6 Da between the peptide pair allows negligible interference between the two isotopic clusters for quantification of peptides of up to 3000 Da. Since only the N-termini of tryptic peptides are differentially labeled and the a, ions are also enhanced in the MALDI MS/MS spectra, interpretation of the fragment ion spectra to obtain sequence information is greatly simplified. It is demonstrated that this technique of N-terminal dimethylation (2ME) after lysine guanidination (GA) or 2MEGA offers several desirable features, including simple experimental procedure, stable products, using inexpensive and commercially available reagents, and negligible isotope effect on reversed-phase separation. LC-MALDI MS combined with this 2MEGA labeling technique was successfully used to identify proteins that included polymorphic variants and low abundance proteins in bovine milk. In addition, by analyzing a mixture of two equal amounts of milk whey fraction as a control, it is shown that the measured average ratio for 56 peptide pairs from 14 different proteins is 1.02, which is very close to the theoretical ratio of 1.00. The calculated percentage error is 2.0% and relative standard deviation is 4.6%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据