4.6 Article

Relative contribution of Rho kinase and protein kinase C to myogenic tone in rat cerebral arteries in hypertension

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01012.2004

关键词

spontaneously hypertensive rats; cerebral arteries; myogenic tone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arterial smooth muscle constriction in response to pressure, i.e., myogenic tone, may involve calcium-dependent and calcium-sensitization mechanisms. Calcium sensitization in vascular smooth muscle is regulated by kinases such as PKC and Rho kinase, and activity of these kinases is known to be altered in cardiovascular disorders. In the present study, we evaluated the relative contribution of PKC and Rho kinase to myogenic tone in cerebral arteries in hypertension. Myogenic tone and arterial wall calcium in Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were measured simultaneously, and the effect of PKC and Rho kinase inhibitors on myogenic tone was evaluated. SHR arteries showed significantly greater myogenic tone than WKY arteries. Pressure/wall tension-arterial wall calcium curves showed a hyperbolic relation in WKY rats, but the curves for SHR arteries were parabolic. Myogenic tone was decreased by the Rho kinase inhibitors Y-27632 and HA-1077, with a significantly greater effect in SHR than in WKY arteries. Reduction in myogenic tone produced by the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I in WKY and SHR arteries was significantly less than that produced by Rho kinase inhibition. The pressure-dependent increase in myogenic tone was significantly decreased by Y-27632, and the decrease was markedly greater than that produced by bisindolylmaleimide I in SHR arteries. In WKY arteries, the pressure-dependent increase in myogenic tone was decreased to a similar extent by Y-27632 and bisindolylmaleimide I. These results suggest greater myogenic tone with increased calcium sensitization in SHR arteries, largely because of Rho kinase activation, with a minor contribution of PKC activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据