4.5 Article

Wheel running as a predictor of cocaine self-administration and reinstatement in female rats

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 590-600

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.10.015

关键词

wheel running; cocaine; locomotor; self-administration; reinstatement; relapse; drug-seeking; female

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA03240, K05 DA15267] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Avidity for behaviors mediated by nondrug rewards, such as novelty seeking or intake of sweets or fats, is predictive of enhanced vulnerability to the locomotor-activating and rewarding effects of drugs of abuse. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether avidity for wheel running was predictive of subsequent cocaine-induced locomotor activity, cocaine self-administration, and cocaine-seeking behavior in rats. Rats with high (HiR) and low (LoR) levels of wheel running were selected from an outbred sample of Wistar rats. These rats were first tested for their locomotor response to an acute injection of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Subsequently, a multi-phase self-administration procedure was used to examine the effect of wheel running on the maintenance, extinction, and cocaine-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in HiR and LoR rats. The results indicate no significant differences between HiR and LoR rats in the cocaine-induced stimulation of locomotor activity. During maintenance, HiR rats self-administered more cocaine than LoR rats. While there were no group differences in saline self-administration behavior during extinction, HiR rats showed higher cocaine-induced reinstatement than LoR rats. Rats that were previously high responders to novelty (day 1 in locomotor track) also showed significantly higher reinstatement than low novelty responders. These results suggest that a propensity for wheel running is associated with increased vulnerability for cocaine self-administration and reinstatement and that HiR rats are more motivated than LoR rats to seek cocaine. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据