4.7 Article

A role for microfilament-based contraction in branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 2010-2018

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00655.x

关键词

actin; Rho; ROCK; kidney; development; ureteric bud; branching

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud/collecting duct epithelium is an important feature of kidney development. Recent work has identified many transcription factors and paracrine signaling molecules that regulate branching, but the physical mechanisms by which these signals act remain largely unknown. The actin cytoskeleton is a common component of mechanisms of morphogenesis. We have therefore studied the expression of, and requirement for actin filaments in the ureteric bud, a branching epithelium of the mammalian kidney. Methods. Embryonic kidney rudiments were grown in organ culture. Actin expression in kidneys growing normally and those in which branching was inhibited was examined using labeled phalloidin. The morphogenetic effects of inhibiting actin organization and tension using cytochalasin D, butanedione monoxime, and Rho kinase ROCK inhibitors were assessed using immunofluorescence. Results. F-actin is expressed particularly strongly in the apical domains of cells at the tips of branching ureteric bud, but this expression depends on the bud actively growing and branching. Blocking the polymerization of actin using cytochalasin D inhibits ureteric bud branching reversibly, as does blocking myosin function using butadiene monoxime. Inhibiting the activation of ROCK, a known activator of myosin, with the drugs Y27632 or with H1152 inhibits the expression of strong actin bundles in the ureteric bud tips and inhibits ureteric bud branching without inhibiting other aspects of renal development. Conclusion. The formation of tension-bearing actin-myosin complexes is essential for branching morphogenesis in the developing kidney.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据