4.4 Article

Primary care attributes, health care system hassles, and chronic illness

期刊

MEDICAL CARE
卷 43, 期 11, 页码 1123-1129

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182530.52979.29

关键词

-

资金

  1. AHRQ HHS [K08 HS013008-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients with a chronic illness are likely to report difficulties in their encounters with the health care system. Although most patients with a chronic illness are managed by primary care clinicians, little is known about how the attributes of primary care might be related to health care system hassles. Objective: We sought to examine the relationship between attributes of primary care and health care system hassles among veterans with one or more chronic illnesses. Research Design: This was a cross-sectional mailed survey. Subjects: We included veterans with one or more chronic illnesses who were cared for in the South Texas Veteran's health care system. Measures: The Components of Primary Care Instrument was used to measure 4 attributes of primary care: accumulated knowledge of the patient by the clinician, coordination of care, communication, and preference for first contact with their primary care clinician. A 16-item health care systems hassles scale was constructed and demonstrated good face validity and reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94. Results: Of the 720 surveys administered by mail, 422 (59%) were returned. Patients with multiple chronic illnesses reported a higher level of hassles than patients with a single chronic illness. After controlling for patient characteristics, primary care communication and coordination of care were inversely associated with patient hassles score: as communication and coordination improved, the reported level of hassles decreased. Conclusions: Effective delivery of primary care to patients with one or more chronic illnesses may be important in decreasing the level of hassles they experience as they interact with the health care delivery system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据