4.6 Article

Immobilization of urease via adsorption onto L-histidine-Ni(II) complexed poly(HEMA-MAH) microspheres:: Preparation and characterization

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 11, 页码 3505-3513

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.058

关键词

urase; immobilization; adsorption; L-histidine; microspheres

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-N-methacryloly-L-histidinemethylester) poly(HEMA-MAH) microspheres was prepared via suspension polymerization. L-Histidine groups of the poly(HEMA-MAH) microspheres were then chelated with Ni(II) ions (poly(HEMA-MAH)-Ni(II)). Urease immobilization onto the poly(HEMA-MAH) and poly(HEMA-MAH)-Ni(II) microspheres from aqueous solutions was investigated in a batch system. The amount of immobilized urease on the poly(HEMA-MAH) and poly(REMA-MAH)-Ni(II) was 47.8 and 66.1 mg/g support, respectively. The values of Michaelis constants K-m for both immobilized urease preparations were significant higher than free enzyme, indicating decreased affinity by the enzyme for its substrate, whereas V-max values were smaller for both immobilized urease preparations compared to free enzyme. However, the urease-immobilized onto the poly(HEMA-MAH)-Ni(II) resulted in an increase in enzyme stability with time. Optimum operational temperature for both immobilized preparations was 5.0 degrees C higher than that of the free enzyme and the temperature profiles of the immobilized preparations were significantly broader. It was observed that enzyme could be repeatedly adsorbed and desorbed on the poly(HEMA-MAH) and poly(HEMA-MAH)-Ni(II) microspheres without loss of adsorption capacity or enzymic activity. Finally, a packed bed enzyme-reactor with/urease-immobilized poly(HEMA-MAH)-Ni(II) microspheres, were used for degradation of urea in the continuous operation mode. The enzyme-reactor operated continuously at 35 degrees C for 40 h without significant loss of performance. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据