4.4 Review

New treatment approaches in renal cell carcinoma

期刊

ANTI-CANCER DRUGS
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 893-900

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e32833123d4

关键词

bevacizumab; everolimus; interferon-alpha; renal cell carcinoma; sorafenib; sunitinib; targeted therapies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is notoriously chemoresistant; up until recently, immunotherapy (in particular interferon-alpha) has represented the treatment of choice. The understanding of the biology of RCC has resulted in the development of targeted therapies. In particular, multilkinase inhibitors (sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib), antivascular endothelial growth factor agents (bevacizumab), and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (temsirolimus, everolimus) now have a role in the approach to different subsets of RCC. Sunitinib is indicated for the first-line therapy of metastatic RCC as a consequence of a positive phase III trial versus interferon-alpha; sorafenib is now registered for the second-line treatment of RCC, which was earlier treated with cytokine as a consequence of a positive phase III trial versus placebo. Bevacizumab is also indicated in the first-line treatment of metastatic RCC given in combination with interferon-a as a consequence of two positive phase III trials. Temsirolimus, unlike the other agents, has also shown activity in poor-prognosis patients, and is now the treatment of choice in previously untreated poor-prognosis RCC as a single agent. Everolimus can be considered as the best therapeutic option in patients with RCC pretreated with targeted agents as a consequence of a positive phase III study versus best supportive care. Markers for appropriate treatment selection, combined use of targeted agents, treatment of special histologies, and adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting represent important special issues to be dealt with in future studies. Anti-Cancer Drugs 20:893-900 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据