4.5 Article

Effect of binge cocaine treatment on hindlimb vascular function

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 479-490

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jat.1083

关键词

cocaine; binge; adrenergic; acetylcholine; nitric oxide; endothelin

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL63128] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic cocaine abuse is known to cause endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. The present study investigated the effect of binge cocaine treatment, a model for chronic cocaine abuse, on the blood flow responses to the adrenergic agonists norepinephrine, phenylephrine and isoproterenol, the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine, and the endothelium independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in the hindlimb vascular bed of male Sprague Dawley rats. Rats received either single binge or double binge treatment. Each binge treatment consisted of three doses of cocaine (30 mg kg(-1) i.p.) for 3 days. For double binge treatment, there was a 4 day recovery period between the binges. At the end of the treatment the rats were anesthetized and agonists were administered into the right hindlimb circulation through a catheter in the left iliac artery and blood flow responses were measured with a flow probe around the right iliac artery. Rats receiving double cocaine binges showed a significant decrease in the magnitude and duration of the blood flow response to norepinephrine and a decrease in the duration of the blood flow response to phenylephrine, isoproterenol and acetylcholine when compared with saline controls. The blood flow response to SNP was not changed. Total plasma nitrate-nitrite levels were significantly reduced and big endothelin levels were significantly increased in rats receiving double cocaine binges. This study demonstrates that binge cocaine treatment can alter endothelial function, while not changing smooth muscle function, and impairs the adrenergic pathway. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据