4.4 Article

From Bacteria to Antineoplastic: Epothilones A Successful History

期刊

ANTI-CANCER AGENTS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 1057-1068

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/18715206113139990133

关键词

Anticancer agents; chemotherapy; ixabepilone; patupilone; sagopilone; structure-activity relationship; semi-syntetic analogs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignancies are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cancer is a cell disease, characterized by a deviation of the control mechanisms of proliferation and differentiation of cells. Among the treatments available, chemotherapy is often the first choice. Epothilones are a new class of anticancer drugs that act by interacting with cellular microtubules interrupting the proliferation of cancer cells. Many synthetic and semi-synthetic analogues of epothilones have been prepared aiming improvement in effectiveness and tolerability, based on QSAR studies. These analogues have been effective for treatment of tumors resistant to first-line treatments. Six new epothilones are being subjected to clinical trials. Ixabepilone (Ixempra (R)) was approved by FDA in 2007, patupilone is in phase III clinical trial for ovarian and peritoneum cancer. Sagopilone, desoxiepothilone and KOS-1584 are in phase II clinical trials, for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma and advanced metastatic breast cancer, metastasic breast cancer and metastatic pulmonary cancer, respectively. Desoxiepothilone reached only phase II trials and BMS-310705 reached phase III/IV trials, but were not approved for clinical use due to adverse effects such as neurotoxicity and severe diarrhea, which were dose-limiting. Furthermore, the low t(1/2) (40h) in comparison with other class analogues, does not recommend the clinical use of this derivative. Some other synthetized epothilones presented antineoplastic activity in vitro, but are not yet submitted to clinical studies. Neuropathies and diarrhea are adverse effects presented by some substances of this class of anticancer drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据