4.3 Article

BEACOPP and COPP/ABVD as salvage treatment after primary extended field radiation therapy of early stage Hodgkins disease -: Results of the German Hodgkin Study Group

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 1561-1567

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428190500178167

关键词

Hodgkin's disease; relapse; early stages; radiotherapy; salvage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with early stage favorable Hodgkin's disease who relapse after extended field radiotherapy have satisfactory results. We retrospectively analysed patients with relapsed HD after initial radiation therapy alone to determine treatment outcome and prognostic factors. Nine- hundred and forty five patients in localized stages without risk factors received either 40 Gy extended field RT or 30 Gy EF RT followed by an additional 10 Gy to involved lymph node regions. 107 patients relapsed and received salvage therapy. Characteristics of the 107 patients at relapse were as follows: median age was 34 years (range 18-75) with relapse occuring at a median of 19 months (range 4-98 months), 31% were female. The majority of patients (93%) were treated with conventional chemotherapy. Sixty-nine percent were treated with COPP/ABVD like regimens, 21% with BEACOPP, and 3% received various other regimens. Seven percent were treated with radiotherapy alone. Complete remission was achieved in 87% of all salvaged patients. The median follow-up after relapse was 45 months. FF2F (freedom from second treatment failure) and OS (overall survival) were 81% and 89%, respectively. In multivariate analysis age was the major prognostic factor for FF2F and OS (p < 0.0001, for both). Further independent prognostic factors were B symptoms (p = 0.05) and salvage chemotherapy (p = 0.03) for FF2F, and B symptoms (p = 0.03) and extranodal involvement (p = 0.02) for OS. The long-term outcome of patients relapsing after EF RT is excellent. Age, B symptoms, extranodal involvement and salvage chemotherapy were identified as prognostic factors for second relapse and survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据