4.7 Article

Serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 concentration is influenced by MMP-3-1612 5A/6A promoter genotype and associated with myocardial infarction

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 258, 期 5, 页码 411-419

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01561.x

关键词

coronary angiography; matrix metalloproteinase-3; myocardial infarction; polymorphism; single nucleotide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. Matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) is implicated in the formation of atherosclerotic plaques, and the MMP-3 -1612 5A/6A polymorphism is associated with myocardial infarction (MI) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The present study examined whether the -1612 5A/6A polymorphism in the promoter region of the MMP-3 gene influences serum concentrations of MMP-3 and whether serum concentrations of MMP-3 are related to extent of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of MI. Design and subjects. This case-control study was conducted in three hospitals in the northern part of Stockholm. A total of 755 MI patients aged below 60 were screened, 433 entered and 387 completed the study. Three hundred and eighty-seven sex- and age-matched control subjects were recruited from the general population of the same county. Methods. The MMP-3 genotype was determined by Pyrosequencing(TM) and the serum MMP-3 concentration was quantified with an immunoassay. Severity and extension of CAD was assessed by quantitative coronary angiography in a subgroup of patients (n = 243). Results. Patients had lower serum MMP-3 concentration than controls. There was a strong association between MMP-3 -1612 5A/6A genotype and serum concentrations of MMP-3. The presence of one or two copies of the 6A-allele was associated with a graded increase in serum MMP-3. In female patients there was an inverse correlation (r = -0.39, P < 0.05) between serum MMP-3 concentration and plaque area. Conclusion. In conclusion, the serum concentration of MMP-3 is influenced by MMP-3 -1612 5A/6A genotype and associated with MI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据