4.3 Article

Renal ischemia induces an increase in nitric oxide levels from tissue stores

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00746.2004

关键词

voltammetry; nitrosothiols; N-acetyl-L-cysteine; buthionine sulfoximine; photosensitive nitric oxide release

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue nitric oxide (NO) levels increase dramatically during ischemia, an effect that has been shown to be partially independent from NO synthases. Because NO is stored in tissues as S-nitrosothiols and because these compounds could release NO during ischemia, we evaluated the effects of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO; an intracellular glutathione depletor), light stimulation (which releases NO, decomposing S-nitrosothiols), and N-acetyl-L-cysteine (a sulfhydryl group donor that repletes S-nitrosothiols stores) on the changes in outer medullary NO concentration produced during 45 min of renal artery occlusion in anesthetized rats. Renal ischemia increased renal tissue NO concentration (+223%), and this effect was maintained along 45 min of renal arterial blockade. After reperfusion, NO concentration fell below preischemic values and remained stable for the remainder of the experiment. Pretreatment with 10 mg/kg nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) decreased significantly basal NO concentration before ischemia, but it did not modify the rise in NO levels observed during ischemia. In rats pretreated with 4 mmol/kg BSO and L-NAME, ischemia was followed by a transient increase in renal NO concentration that fell to preischemic values 20 min before reperfusion. A similar response was observed when the kidney was illuminated 40 min before the ischemia. The coadministration of 10 mg/kg iv N-acetyl-L-cysteine with BSO + L-NAME restored the increase in NO levels observed during renal ischemia and prevented the depletion of renal thiol groups. These results demonstrate that the increase in renal NO concentration observed during ischemia originates from thiol-dependent tissue stores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据