4.6 Article

Contribution of nonlinear mechanisms in the persistence of multiple tidal inlet systems

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 475-491

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.06.018

关键词

tidal inlets; barrier islands; tidal currents; coastal morphology; lagoonal sedimentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple tidal inlet stability has been modeled following either a single-inlet stability approach or a simple linear analytical approach, and the results suggest that these systems are not stable. However, there is evidence that shallow multiple tidal inlet systems are strongly nonlinear and that they can be stable on a historical time scale. Based on numerical simulations of the hydrodynamics of Ria Formosa, a shallow lagoon in the south of Portugal, in which multiple tidal inlets have persisted in a historical time scale, the effects of tidal distortion and residual circulation on the persistence of multiple inlets in the system were analyzed. Numerical simulations using a 2-D vertically averaged finite element model served (1) to identify the existence of three hydrodynamically independent sub-embayments in the system, (2) to create realistic physical disturbances (change in inlet cross-sectional area) and analyze the hydrodynamic response of the system to such disturbances, (3) to identify and quantify the existing nonlinear hydrodynamic processes (tidal distortion, ebb/flood dominance, residual flow patterns), and (4) to analyze the overall stability of the western sub-embayment using the closure curve approach. The results show the importance of the nonlinear processes in the hydrodynamics of multiple inlet systems, and the need to consider them when analyzing inlet stability in such systems, and suggest that, specifically for Ria Formosa, if the existing jetties at one of the inlets in the western sub-embayment were removed, this area of the system would reach natural stability and equilibrium with three inlets. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据