4.0 Article

The genus Plagiochila (Dumort.) Dumort.: (Plagiochilaceae, Hepaticophytina) in Madeira Archipelago -: Molecular relationships, ecology, and biogeographic affinities

期刊

NOVA HEDWIGIA
卷 81, 期 3-4, 页码 449-461

出版社

GEBRUDER BORNTRAEGER
DOI: 10.1127/0029-5035/2005/0081-0449

关键词

Plagiochila; Madeira Archipelago; Laurisilva; ITS; molecular relationships; ecology; biogeographic affinities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plagiochila is one of the most frequent bryophyte genera in Madeira, inhabiting almost all habitats of the Madeiran laurel forest (Laurisilva). Results on the biodiversity, ecology and molecular relationships based on nuclear ribosomal ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of all Plagiochila species referred to Madeira Archipelago are summarized with the aims to provide (i) a first molecular confirmation of a species inventory of a bryophyte genus in a specific geographic region and (ii) a bryophyte example for displaying biogeographic affinities of the Madeiran laurel forest. The molecular analyses confirm the presence of nine species in Madeira, which belong to four sections: Plagiochila sect. Arrectae, sect. Rutilantes, sect. Vagae and sect. Plagiochila. Section Arrectae is represented in Madeira by five species, A bifaria, P. punctala, P. retrorsa, P. spinulosa, and A stricta. Section Rutilantes is represented by P. exigua and the Macaronesian endemic P. maderensis, which is reported for the first time to Canary Is. The sections Vague and Plagiochila are represented by a single species each, P. virginica and P. porelloides, respectively. The molecular data indicate strong biogeographic affinities of the Madeiran Plagiochila flora with Central and northern South America, and to a lesser extent with Africa and Continental Europe. The environmental conditions found in Madeira Island, especially habitat stability and the stable climate in the laurel forest, may have favored the development of populations of Plagiochila species from neotropical sections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据