4.5 Article

CHOP/GADD153 is a mediator of apoptotic death in substantia nigra dopamine neurons in an in vivo neurotoxin model of parkinsonism

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 95, 期 4, 页码 974-986

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03428.x

关键词

apoptosis; endoplasmic reticulum stress; oxidative stress; Parkinson's disease; programmed cell death; substantia nigra

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES08681, R01 ES008681] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS38370, P50 NS038370-07, R56 NS026836, R21 NS043628, R01 NS026836, NS43628, P50 NS038370-06, R01 NS026836-13, NS26836, P50 NS038370, R01 NS026836-14] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is increasing evidence that neuron death in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, is due to the activation of programmed cell death. However, the upstream mediators of cell death remain largely unknown. One approach to the identification of upstream mediators is to perform gene expression analysis in disease models. Such analyses, performed in tissue culture models induced by neurotoxins, have identified up-regulation of CHOP/GADD153, a transcription factor implicated in apoptosis due to endoplasmic reticulum stress or oxidative injury. To evaluate the disease-related significance of these findings, we have examined the expression of CHOP/GADD153 in neurotoxin models of parkinsonism in living animals. Nuclear expression of CHOP protein is observed in developmental and adult models of dopamine neuron death induced by intrastriatal injection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6OHDA) and in models induced by 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). CHOP is a mediator of neuron death in the adult 60HDA model because a null mutation results in a reduction in apoptosis. In the chronic MPTP model, however, while CHOP is robustly expressed, the null mutation does not protect from the loss of neurons. We conclude that the role of CHOP depends on the nature of the toxic stimulus. For 6OHDA, an oxidative metabolite of dopamine, it is a mediator of apoptotic death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据