4.4 Article

The structure of T6 bovine insulin

期刊

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444905025771

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM56829] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porcine insulin differs in sequence from bovine insulin at residues A8 (Thr in porcine --> Ala in bovine) and A10 ( Ile in porcine --> Val in bovine). The structure of T-6 hexameric bovine insulin has been determined to 2.25 angstrom resolution at room temperature and refined to a residual of 0.162. The structure of the independent dimer is nearly identical to the T-6 porcine insulin dimer: the mean displacement of all backbone atoms is 0.16 angstrom, with the largest displacements occurring at AlaB30. Each of two independent zinc ions is octahedrally coordinated by three HisB10 side chains and three water molecules. As has been observed in both human and porcine insulin, the GluB13 side chains are directed towards the center of the hexamer, where a short contact of 2.57 angstrom occurs between two independent carboxyl O atoms, again suggesting the presence of a centered hydrogen bond. No significant displacements of backbone atoms or changes in conformation are observed at A8 or A10. Since there are no interhexamer hydrogen-bonded contacts involving A8 in either porcine or bovine insulin, the change in the identity of this residue appears to have little or no effect upon the packing of the hexamers in the unit cell. In contrast, the side chains of the three A10 residues in one trimer make van der Waals contacts with the A10 side chains in a translationally related hexamer. As a consequence of the loss of the C-delta 1 atom from the isoleucine residue in porcine insulin to produce valine in bovine insulin, there is a 0.36 angstrom decrease in the distance between independent pairs of C-beta atoms and a 0.24 angstrom decrease in the c dimension of the unit cell. Thus, the net effect of the change in sequence at A10 is to strengthen the stabilizing hydrophobic interactions between hexamers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据