4.7 Article

Decline in fertility of mouse sperm with abnormal chromatin during epididymal passage as revealed by ICSI

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 3101-3108

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei169

关键词

embryo development; epididymal sperm; ICSI; testicular sperm; transition nuclear proteins

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-16672] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-16843, HD-30284] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed that ICSI with cauda epididymal or ejaculated sperm of infertile mice or men, respectively, was less effective in fertilization and normal embryo development than ICSI using sperm from the testes. These studies suggested that sperm nuclear quality declined after release from the testis, but the site where this loss of fertility occurs has not been localized. METHODS: We performed ICSI with testicular, caput, and cauda epididymal sperm from infertile Tnp1-/-Tnp2+/- mutant mice, which have a minimal level of transition nuclear proteins and are sterile by natural mating. RESULTS: When the heads of motile sperm from the testis or caput epididymis of Tnp1-/-Tnp2+/- males were injected into enucleated mouse oocytes, sperm chromosomes showed no difference from those of wild-type mice, but the chromosomes from sperm taken from the cauda epididymis of mutant males showed increased abnormalities. Injection of testicular or caput epididymal sperm from Tnp1-/-Tnp2+/- males into intact oocytes resulted in normal embryonic and fetal development and yields of liveborn equivalent to wild-type, but cauda sperm from Tnp1-/-Tnp2-/- mice produced lower implantation rates and yields of liveborn than did those from wild-type mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that in mice with sperm chromatin abnormalities, the decline in fertility of sperm with ICSI occurs after the caput epididymis. The advantage of using caput epididymal sperm for ICSI in certain situations may be considered as an approach to be tested in human assisted reproduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据