4.8 Article

Oleate desaturase enzymes of soybean: evidence of regulation through differential stability and phosphorylation

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 433-446

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02535.x

关键词

oleate desaturase; FAD2; protein phosphorylation; 26S proteasome; polyunsaturated fatty acids; soybean (Glycine max)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The endoplasmic reticulum-associated oleate desaturase FAD2 (1-acyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine Delta 12-desaturase) is the key enzyme responsible for the production of linoleic acid in non-photosynthetic tissues of plants. Little is known, however, concerning the post-transcriptional mechanisms that regulate the activity of this important enzyme. The soybean genome possesses two seed-specific isoforms of FAD2, designated FAD2-1A and FAD2-1B, which differ at only 24 amino acid residues. Expression studies in yeast revealed that the FAD2-1A isoform is more unstable than FAD2-1B, particularly when cultures were maintained at elevated growth temperatures. Analysis of chimeric FAD2-1 constructs led to the identification of two domains that appear to be important in mediating the temperature-dependent instability of the FAD2-1A isoform. The enhanced degradation of FAD2-1A at high growth temperatures was partially abrogated by treating the cultures with the 26S proteasome-specific inhibitor MG132, and by expressing the FAD2-1A cDNA in yeast strains devoid of certain ubiquitin-conjugating activities, suggesting a role for ubiquitination and the 26S proteasome in protein turnover. In addition, phosphorylation state-specific antipeptide antibodies demonstrated that the Serine-185 of FAD2-1 sequences is phosphorylated during soybean seed development. Expression studies of phosphopeptide mimic mutations in yeast suggest that phosphorylation may downregulate enzyme activity. Collectively, the results show that post-translational regulatory mechanisms are likely to play an important role in modulating FAD2-1 enzyme activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据