4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

A new curriculum for hysteroscopy training as demonstrated by an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
卷 193, 期 5, 页码 1856-1865

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.057

关键词

curriculum; hysteroscopy training; surgical skills; reliability; validity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop in effective curriculum to teach hysteroscopy, as well as to develop an objective assessment instrument (OSATS). Study design: All 24 residents in out-training program attended a 3-hour hysteroscopy curriculum in each of 3 years. Each year after the curriculum, an OSATS was administered consisting of an assembly and operative task. Each task was evaluated with a task-specific checklist and a previously validated global assessment form. Twenty-four residents from an outside institution served as controls. All residents were examined by blinded and unblinded examiners. Results: The reliability coefficient was .7857 for the checklist and .9763 for the global scale. Interrater reliability for the checklist was .7478 and ranged from .4222 to .9329 for the global instruments. Evaluation of construct validity revealed that the junior residents at both locations did significantly worse on the checklist and global scale than the senior residents for all 3 years of the study (P < .001). Those residents provided the curriculum did significantly better on both the checklist and the global scale than the resident controls with a mean of 45% versus 63% for the checklist and 18.3 versus 24.9 for the global score. (P = .001 checklist, P = .007 global scale). Conclusion: This curriculum is all effective way to impart knowledge and skill in the assembly and use of the operative hysteroscope. The checklist developed for this OSATS has excellent reliability and construct validity. (C) 2005 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据