4.6 Review

Respiratory viral infections and asthma pathogenesis: A critical role for dendritic cells?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 161-169

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2005.07.002

关键词

respiratory virus; asthma; sensitization; exacerbation; murine models; DC

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Respiratory viral infections can influence the course of asthma at different time points. Severe respiratory viral infections during early age are associated with a higher prevalence of asthma in later childhood. In established asthma, viral infections are a frequent cause of asthma exacerbation. Objectives: The present review focuses on epidemiological and experimental animal data that can illuminate the mechanisms by which viral infections can lead to sensitization to antigen, and exacerbate ongoing allergic airway inflammation and focuses on the role played by dendritic cells (DCs). Results: In experimental rodent models of asthma, respiratory viral infection at the time of a first inhaled antigen exposure is described to induce Th2 sensitization and to enhance the allergic response to a second encounter with the same antigen. Virus infections can modulate airway dendritic cell function by upregulation of costimulatory molecule expression, enhanced recruitment, and by inducing an inflammatory environment, all leading to an enhanced antigen presentation and possibly changing the normal tolerogenic response to inhaled antigen into an immunogenic response. In established asthma, respiratory viral infections attract several inflammatory cells, alter receptor expression on airway smooth muscle and modulate neuroimmune mechanisms, possibly leading to exacerbation of disease. Conclusions: Animal data suggest that the link between respiratory viral infections and increased asthma is causally related, the viral infection acting on the immune and structural cells to enhance antigen presentation and inflammatory cell recruitment. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据