4.3 Article

Effects of methyl-β-cyclodextrin-mediated cholesterol depletion in porcine sperm compared to somatic cells

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 386-395

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20351

关键词

sperm capacitation; merocyanin; GM-1 staining; cyclodextrin; membrane damage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the use of methyl-beta-cycloclextrin (MBCD) to support capacitation of sperm cells was studied. Sperm were incubated with MBCD or alternatively capacitated in an in vitro fertilization medium. The effects of these incubations on phospholipid scrambling (using merocyanin), cholesterol depletion, GM-1 localization (using cholera-toxin B (CTX)), and membrane deterioration were assessed. For comparison, this was also tested in MBCD-treated MDCK cells. In MDCK cells, upto 71% of cholesterol was depleted, which coincided with a more diffuse CTX staining without any obvious effects on cell viability. In sperm, a similar depletion of 53% cholesterol was found after a 10 mM MBCD treatment. However, no merocyanin response was observed in viable sperm after MBCD treatments (indicating a lack of membrane changes associated with sperm capacitation). In contrast to MDCK, cells > 1mM MBCD caused plasma membrane disintegration and rendered sperm immotile. At higher concentrations also acrosome disruption was noted. CTX staining was absent at < 0.1 mM MBCD incubations but appeared at higher MBCD levels and was found to be specific for deteriorated cells that showed morphological signs of acrosome disruption. No significant plasma membrane deterioration, acrosome disruption, and sperm immotility nor CTX staining and only a modest (< 15%) cholesterol depletion were observed in conventionally capacitated sperm, where 40% of the intact sperm showed merocyanin staining. Taken together, the results indicate that membranes of sperm are more sensitive to MBCD-mediated cholesterol depletion than MDCK cells and that the use of MBCD to support sperm capacitation cannot be recommended due to its spermicidal effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据