4.7 Article

Electrophysiological properties of pluripotent human and mouse embryonic stem cells

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 1526-1534

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0299

关键词

embryonic stem cells; electrophysiology; pluripotency; ion channels

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL072857-01A2, R01 HL-52768, R01 HL-72857] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) possess promising potential for cell-based therapies, but their electrophysiological properties have not been characterized. Here we describe the presence of ionic currents in mouse (m) and human (h) ESCs and their physiological function. In mESCs, tetraethylammonium (TEA)-sensitive depolarization-activated delayed rectifier K+ currents (IKDR) (8.6 +/- 0.9 pA/pF at + 40 mV; IC50 = 1.2 +/- 0.3 mM), which contained components sensitive to 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) (IC50 = 0.5 +/- 0.1 mM) and 100 nM Ca2+ -activated K+ current (IKCa) blocker iberiotoxin (IBTX), were detected in 52.3% of undifferentiated cells. IKDR was similarly present in hESCs (similar to 100%) but with an approximately sixfold higher current density (47.5 +/- 7.9 pA/pF at + 40 mV). When assayed by bromodeoxyurindine incorporation, application of TEA, 4-AP, or IBTX significantly reduced the proliferation of mESCs and hESCs in a dose-dependent manner (p <.05). A hyperpolarization-activated inward current (I-h) (-2.2 +/- 0.4 pA/pF at -120 mV) was detected in 23% of mESCs but not hESCs. Neither Na-v nor Ca-v currents were detected in mESCs and hESCs. Microarray and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analyses identified several candidate genes for the ionic currents discovered. Collectively, our results indicate that pluripotent ESCs functionally express several specialized ion channels and further highlight similarities and differences between the two species. Practical considerations for the therapeutic use of ESCs are discussed. STEM CELLS 2005;23:1526-1534.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据