4.7 Article

Apoptosis in human unfertilized oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 84, 期 5, 页码 1417-1423

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.038

关键词

apoptosis; fertilization failure; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; ICSI; human oocytes; virgin oocytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the presence of programmed cell death in unfertilized oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), assuming that previous apoptotic events could be correlated with the fertilization failure. Design: Comparison of the rate of DNA fragmentation in human oocytes at different stages of maturation soon after pick-up (control) and in unfertilized oocytes after ICSI treatment. Setting: In vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory with extensive ICSI experience. Patient(s): Sixty-three patients undergoing assisted fertilization by ICSI. Intervention(s): Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated digoxigenin-dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay and anticaspase-3 cleaved immunoassay to detect apoptosis in control and ICSI-treated oocytes. Main Outcome Measure(s): Difference in the percentage of oocytes demonstrating DNA fragmentation between control oocytes and unfertilized ICSI treated oocytes at different stages of maturation. Result(s): The DNA fragmentation by TUNEL assay, appeared in all the immature control oocytes, but only 37% of mature oocytes showed DNA fragmentation. This DNA fragmentation was observed in 88.8% of the oocytes unfertilized after ICSI, furthermore, DNA fragmentation appeared as well in the sperm injected into the cytoplasm. Conclusion(s): The study has shown DNA fragmentation in human oocytes unfertilized after ICSI. The evidence is confirmed as well in control oocytes, free from in vitro culture or manipulation stress. Capase-3 immunoassay suggests the presence of apoptosis. The high percentage of oocytes demonstrating DNA fragmentation in the unfertilized oocytes could be correlated with fertilization failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据