期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
卷 91, 期 2, 页码 189-193出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.08.013
关键词
cervical carcinoma; human papillomavirus; liquid-based cytologic evaluation; visual inspection; colposcopy
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of 4 screening methods for cervical neoplasia. Methods: Cervical samples from 450 women were evaluated for human papillomavirus DNA with a second-generation hybridization assay. Visual inspection, colposcopy, and liquid-based cytology were also performed for 273 of these women. The sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), Youden index, and K value of the different screening methods were compared. Results: Liquid-based cytology was superior in specificity (98.63%) and PPV (92.86%) to visual inspection and colposcopy, white human papillomavirus DNA testing was superior in sensitivity (88.89%) and NPV (97.10%) to visual inspection and colposcopy. The best concordance with histologic findings was achieved by using both liquid-based cytology and viral DNA hybridization. Conclusion: Visual inspection and colposcopy should not be used when screening for early stage cervical lesions. The DNA hybridization assay is the best choice in primary screening, if available. Screening should begin at the age of 20 years. (c) 2005 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据