4.7 Article

An aqueous extract of the popular Chinese nutraceutical Kwei Ling Ko (Tortoise shell-Rhizome Jelly) activates the PPARγ pathway and down-regulates the NFκB activity

期刊

PHYTOMEDICINE
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 748-759

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2004.11.002

关键词

adipocyte differentiation; NF kappa B; PPAR; reporter gene assay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is generally believed that the popular nutraccutical 'Kwei Ling Ko' (KLK; Tortoise shell-Rhizome jelly) has anti-inflammatory effects, but the mechanism by which its effects are manifested remains unknown. Peroxisome proliferation-activated receptors (PPARs) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor/transcription factor superfamily with multiple roles in adipocyte differentiation, glucose homeostasis, immunomodulation and anti-inflammatory regulation. As PPAR is required for adipocyte induction, we used adipogenesis as a possible screen for the activation of the PPAR pathway. Interestingly, an aqueous extract of KLK (sKLK) was able to induce the adipocyte differentiation of fibroblast cell lines. Adipogenesis was confirmed by flow cytometric analysis using a fluorescent lipid stain. Up-regulation of PPAR gamma transcripts during adipogenesis was also demonstrated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The sKLK-induced adipogenesis was similar to that elicited by insulin. The activity of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF kappa B), a transcription factor responsible for the regulation of pro-inflammatory genes, was also down-regulated in response to sKLK. Luciferase reporter gene assays further demonstrated that sKLK inhibited both basal and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-stimulated NF kappa B activation. The activities reported in this study support an immunomodulatory effect for sKLK. As activation of PPAR pathway has a dual role in adipogenesis and anti-inflammation, our observations are consistent with the notion that KLK possesses anti-inflammatory properties. (c) 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据