4.4 Article

The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib sensitizes colon cancer cells to irinotecan

期刊

ANTI-CANCER DRUGS
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 1099-1108

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200511000-00009

关键词

camptothecin; colorectal cancer; Iressa; irinotecan; sensitivity; SN-38; resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overactivity plays a significant role in colon cancer biology and has been associated with poor clinical prognosis. Early clinical trials reported efficacy of receptor-targeted compounds, including modulation of clinical irinotecan resistance. We investigated the effects of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib on cellular determinants of irinotecan resistance in human colon cancer cells. At non-cytotoxic concentrations, gefitinib sensitized colon cancer cells to SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. Gefitinib increased the SN-38-mediated induction of protein-linked DNA single-strand breaks in a dose-dependent manner, with no alteration of topoisomerase (Topo) I protein expression or enzymatic activity. Whereas Topo II beta protein expression was not affected by gefitinib, significant time- and concentration-dependent downregulation of Topo II alpha protein and inhibition of its enzymatic function were observed, corresponding to a G(1) phase cell cycle arrest. Gefitinib significantly inhibited EGFR-associated signaling molecules, including phospho-mitogen-activated protein kinase or protein kinase C, which may account for decreases in proliferation or topoisomerase activity, respectively. Although a dose-dependent decrease of the BCRP/MXR/ABCP half-transporter was observed under gefitinib, cellular pharmacokinetics revealed no significant differences in accumulation or retention of the active SN-38 lactone using reverse-phase HPLC analysis. This study delineates mechanisms that may contribute to the synergism observed between irinotecan and EGFR inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据