4.8 Article

Porous PLGA microparticles: AI-700, an intravenously administered ultrasound contrast agent for use in echocardiography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 108, 期 1, 页码 21-32

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.07.020

关键词

ultrasound; microparticle; contrast agent; spray dry; echocardiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The production and characterization of Al-700, an intravenously administered ultrasound contrast agent under investigation for myocardial perfusion echocardiography, are described. The product consists of small, porous microparticles filled with decafluorobutane gas, and formulated as a dry powder. Small scale spray drying studies demonstrated that porous PLGA microparticles could be produced with varying porosity using ammonium bicarbonate as a volatile pore-forming agent. The porous microparticles of Al-700 were created aseptically by spray drying a water-in-oil emulsion containing poly-D,L-lactide-co-glycolide, 1,2-diarachidoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and ammonium bicarbonate using a two-chamber spray dryer. The porous microparticles were further formulated into a dry powder drug product (Al-700) containing decafluorobutane gas and excipients. The dry powder was reconstituted with sterile water prior to evaluation. Microscopy demonstrated that the microparticles were sphere-shaped and internally porous. The microparticles were appropriately sized for intravenous administration, having an average diameter of 2.3 mu m. Zeta-potential analysis demonstrated that the microparticles would be expected to be stable post-reconstitution. The microparticles retained encapsulated gas postreconstitution, had high acoustic potency that was stable over time and were physically stable upon exposure to highpower ultrasound, as used clinically. AT-700 has the characteristics desirable for an intravenously administered ultrasound contrast agent for myocardial perfusion echocardiography. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据