4.7 Article

Glucagon-expressing neurons within the retina regulate the proliferation of neural progenitors in the circumferential marginal zone of the avian eye

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 44, 页码 10157-10166

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3247-05.2005

关键词

retina; glucagon; proliferation; progenitor; stem cell; insulin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucagon-expressing retinal amacrine cells have been implicated in regulating postnatal ocular growth. Furthermore, experimentally accelerated rates of ocular growth increase the number of neurons added to the peripheral edge of the retina. Accordingly, we assayed whether glucagon-expressing neurons within the retina regulate the proliferation of progenitors in the circumferential marginal zone (CMZ) of the postnatal chicken eye. We found that glucagon-containing neurites are heavily clustered within the CMZ at the peripheral edge of the retina. Many of these neurites originate from a cell type that is distinct from other types of retinal neurons, which we termed large glucagon-expressing neurons (LGENs). The LGENs are immunoreactive for glucagon and glucagon-like peptide 1 ( GLP1), have a unipolar morphology, produce an axon that projects into the CMZ, and are found only in ventral regions of the retina. In dorsal regions of the retina, a smaller version of the LGENs densely ramifies neurites in the CMZ. Intraocular injections of glucagon or GLP1 suppressed the proliferation of progenitors in the CMZ, whereas a glucagon-receptor antagonist promoted proliferation. In addition, we found that glucagon, GLP1, and glucagon antagonist influenced the number of progenitors in the CMZ. We conclude that the LGENs may convey visual information to the CMZ to control the addition of new cells to the edge of the retina. We propose that glucagon/GLP1 released from LGENs acts in opposition to insulin (or insulin-like growth factor) to regulate precisely the proliferation of retinal progenitors in the CMZ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据