4.7 Article

Molecular control of spinal accessory motor neuron/axon development in the mouse spinal cord

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 44, 页码 10119-10130

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3455-05.2005

关键词

spinal accessory motor neurons; BEN/ALCAM/SC1/DM-GRASP/MuSC; Gli2; netrin; DCC; Nkx2.9; exit point

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [F31 NS043852, F31 NS43852-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the developing vertebrate spinal cord, motor neuron subtypes are distinguished by the settling positions of their cell bodies, patterns of gene expression, and the paths their axons follow to exit the CNS. The inclusive set of cues required to guide a given motor axon subtype from cell body to target has yet to be identified, in any species. This is attributable, in part, to the unavailability of markers that demarcate the complete trajectory followed by a specific class of spinal motor axons. Most spinal motor neurons extend axons out of the CNS through ventral exit points. In contrast, spinal accessory motor neurons (SACMNs) project dorsally directed axons through lateral exit points (LEPs), and these axons assemble into the spinal accessory nerve (SAN). Here we show that an antibody against BEN/ALCAM/SC1/DM-GRASP/MuSC selectively labels mouse SACMNs and can be used to trace the pathfinding of SACMN axons. We use this marker, together with a battery of transcription factor-deficient or guidance cue/receptor-deficient mice to identify molecules required for distinct stages of SACMN development. Specifically, we find that Gli2 is required for the initial extension of axons from SACMN cell bodies, and that netrin-1 and its receptor Dcc are required for the proper dorsal migration of these cells and the dorsally directed extension of SACMN axons toward the LEPs. Furthermore, in the absence of the transcription factor Nkx2.9, SACMN axons fail to exit the CNS. Together, these findings suggest molecular mechanisms that are likely to regulate key steps in SACMN development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据