4.7 Review

Novel mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer-coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesive drug delivery systems

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 1583-1594

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.008

关键词

mucoadhesion; mucin particle; BIACORE; confocal laser scanning microscopy; peptide drug; oral administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To design an effective particulate drug delivery system having mucoadhesive function, several mucoadhesion tests for polymers and the resultant particulate systems were developed. Mucin particle method is a simple mucoadhesion test for polymers, in which the commercial mucin particles are used. By measuring the change in particle size or zeta potential of the mucin particle in a certain concentration of polymer solution, we could estimate the extent of their mucoadhesive property. BIACORE method is also a novel mucoadhesion test for polymers. On passing through the mucin suspension on the polymer-immobilized chip of BIACORE instrument, the interaction was quantitatively evaluated with the change in its response diagram. By using these mucoadhesion tests, we detected a strong mucoadhesive property of several types of chitosan and Carbopol. Evaluation of mucoadhesive property of polymer-coated particulate systems was demonstrated with the particle counting method developed by us. To detect the mucoadhesive phenomena in the intestinal tract, we observed the rat intestine with the confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) after oral administration of the particulate systems. The resultant photographs clearly showed a longer retention of submicron-sized chitosan-coated liposomes (ssCS-Lip) in the intestinal tract than other liposomal particles tested such as non-coated liposomes and chitosan-coated multilamellar one. These observations explained well the superiority of the ssCS-Lip as drug carrier in oral administration of calcitonin in rats than other liposomal particles. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据