4.4 Article

Residual viraemia in subjects with chronic HIV infection and viral load < 50 copies/ml:: the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy

期刊

AIDS
卷 19, 期 16, 页码 1843-1847

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.aids.0000188426.87538.ed

关键词

HIV-1; HAART; plasma HIV-1 RNA; HIV-1 DNA; mutations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine factors associated with < 2.5 copies/ml plasma HIV RNA in subjects treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and with viraemia < 50 copies/ml. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of 84 HIV-positive patients taking HAART with plasma HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml for at least 6 months and no history of virological failure. Methods: Current HAART therapy was based on a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) in 66%, a protease inhibitor in 26% and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 7%. Viraemia levels were measured using a modified ultrasensitive Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test able to quantify plasma HIV RNA to a lower limit of 2.5 copies/ml; proviral DNA was measured with a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Analysis of variance and multiple logistic regression analysis were utilized to test for associations between residual replication and other variables. Results: Residual HIV viraemia > 2.5 copies/ml was found in 50% of subjects; 94% of subjects had detectable proviral DNA ( >= 20 copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and 21 % had archived mutations. Usage of a NNRTI-based HAART was the only independent predictor of viral suppression below the cut-off value of the modified ultrasensitive assay. Conclusions: In our population, NNRTI-based HAART seems to have a stronger impact on residual replication than protease inhibitor-based HAART. This finding may be considered in therapeutic decisions such as the choice of initial HAART regimen and the interruption or simplification of treatment. (c) 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据